Greg Rucka rips Hollywood and Comics a New One
dcwomenkickingass:
The folks over at Comicbook interviewed Greg Rucka where he discusses the treatment of women by Hollywood and DC Comics. Rucka’s discussion of Hollywood comes in reference to the development of his Queen and Country for the big screen. That discussion, as you’ll see, turns into a discussion of the comic book world. Rucka left DC Comics in 2010.
You should go click through to the whole interview and listen to the podcast this was taken from but here are some of the more provocative soundbites:
“There’s an absurd marketing issue which is this conceit that Hollywood labors under and they’ve got studies to back it up, that their market is men 18 to 34, and they won’t go see a woman in an action role, which is utter bulls**t. I mean, if you can think of any demographic that’s more likely to go see women in an action role it’s going to be a guy who’s eighteen! What’s the thing that eighteen-year-old is constantly thinking about? Girls. It’s absurd and the more you look into it, the more the fallacy falls apart….
….The same studies that these guys swear by—‘our demographic is men age 18 to 34, who drive purchasing’—well, alright. Those same studies say it’s women age 20 to 40 who control the income outlay. They control the pocketbook, so why aren’t you marketing to them? It doesn’t make any sense and it’s a fundamentally misogynistic market field and people wonder why we see such negative representations of women or the same consistent galling of women and objectification of women in media and you strip everything away and the only argument that remains is it’s a misogynistic industry—they don’t like women. And you see that all over comics now, too.
These things aren’t going away now and I think in large part the reason they’re not going away is that in particular DC did an extraordinary job of revealing the truth of their situation—they don’t care.
That’s what they said at San Diego—not only do we not care but we actually don’t want you here, go away. Well, guess what? That’s a sh***y business model and you’re going to lose money and you’re going to lose readers. It doesn’t make any sense to me from a business standpoint, right? I was lecturing at the University of Oregon yesterday and the only analog I can come up with is if Apple had said, ‘you know what? We’re only selling iPhones to blondes.’ It doesn’t make any sense—why would you just exclude a whole portion of your market? And the combination of arrogance and ignorance is appaling, and people should be angry. And the mere fact that the people who then actually spoke out about it who were threatened—talk about wanting to make ourselves look good. Nice endorsement for the industry, there.”
Yeah.
I really don’t have anything to add.
Except,
Preach it Reverend Rucka!
Testify.
Honestly, this is why I am angry at the New 52. While Batwoman has come out okay in DC comics, all the other women, (minus minor characters like Talia al Ghul. I won’t say all female villians/questionable characters haven’t, because look at Catwoman/Selina Kyle,) have undergone this conformity to be ‘ideal women’.
Que?
It’s very wrong and sad that because Kate Kane has been allowed to carry a series as her own character had been prior to the reboot, while others, such as Barbara Gordon and BoP, have been forced to change for the worse.
Very sad. This is why I am grateful for Young Justice and my collection of DC comics prior to 2011.
Characters like Dinah Lance/Black Canary and Barbara Gordon/Batgirl weren’t treated this way back in the seventies, eighties and nineties, why on Earth in the 21st century have they become so two-dimensional?
